If other figures in American law are celebrated for what they changed, the late Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas has been celebrated for what he kept unchanged.
Dave Pettinger, U.S. Forest Service via Flickr
Yakima, Washington, with its orchards and hills and a railroad to bigger places, was a starting point for the late Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas. But those who study his life and his jurisprudence could be forgiven for thinking that, even if his real roots were in Yakima, his spirit had its roots in America’s wilderness.
After graduating from Whitman College in Washington, Douglas completed Columbia Law School, and taught at Yale Law School before he found his way to Washington D.C., focusing on securities law. Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed him to the Supreme Court in 1939.
If other figures in American law are celebrated for what they changed, Douglas has been celebrated for keeping things unchanged. Thanks in part to his protest hikes and legal efforts, there is no big highway along the C&O Canal in Washington, D.C., no dam across the Red River Gorge in Kentucky, and no huge Disney resort in Mineral King Valley in California’s southern Sierra Mountains.
Judge M. Margaret McKeown, a member of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, has studied Douglas’s life and law; her book on the justice is nearing completion. At a recent talk at Stanford University’s Bill Lane Center for the American West, she described Douglas as “A loner, a non-conformist, an individualist.” His Supreme Court opinions were often dissents – 486 of them. As Judge McKeown said, “You don’t dissent for today. You dissent for the future.”
Here are Judge McKeown’s answers to questions about Justice Douglas’s life, his legal theories, and the role he played in the growth of environmental law.
As a child, Douglas was sickly with polio, so the paths and mountains nearby his home in Yakima were both an escape and also a chance to build strength in his legs. He was inspired by the solitude and beauty of the wilderness and he honed a deep understanding of the ecology, wildlife, and plant life of the region. Mt. Rainier, the Cougar Lakes, and the Goat Rocks areas of the Cascade Mountains were among his favorite places. In later years, he ventured to the Rocky Mountains, the Appalachian Mountains, the Big Thicket in Texas, and other places of natural beauty in the United States, like Maine. He also took early exploratory trips to Tibet and the Middle East.
After a brief stint in California, his preacher father moved the family to the small town of Cleveland, Washington, near the Oregon border. He was six when his father died and his mother resettled in Yakima, Washington. At his father’s funeral, he could see the majestic Mt. Adams, a glaciated peak that is part of the Cascade range. He often spoke of the mountain in personal terms: “Adams subtly became a force to me to tie to, a symbol of stability and strength.” His father’s spirituality was a legacy. The mountains were his chapel and the wilderness his spiritual inspiration. He had several good boyhood hiking companions. This story of his reverence for nature and the mountains is best told by Douglas in his 1950 book, Of Men and Mountains.
National Park Service; Henk Sijgers via Flickr;
The awakening of his public advocacy came in 1954 when he learned that there was a plan to build a parkway to the C&O Canal, near Washington, D.C. He read an editorial in the Washington Post supporting the proposal and wrote a counter piece challenging the editors to hike with him to see for themselves why a parkway would be a travesty. They accepted the challenge. Douglas, along with nine companions, hiked the entire 184 miles of the towpath along the canal. Among those who finished with him was Olaus Murie, Director of The Wilderness Society and a noted wildlife biologist. They became close friends and collaborators. Though the Post editors weren’t among those who went the entire distance, the hike and Douglas’ advocacy changed their mind. The parkway was never built. A statue commemorating Douglas’ role and inspiration can be found at the beginning of the C&O towpath.
Harris & Ewing via Wikimedia Commons
During his time as a law professor at Yale, he developed a specialty in business reorganization and bankruptcy. He began commuting to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the District of Columbia, where he headed a special study. Soon after he was appointed as a Commissioner. His patron was Joseph Kennedy, then Chair of the SEC. Within a few years of his arrival in DC, Douglas became Chair of the SEC.
When Justice Brandeis announced he was stepping down from the Court, Roosevelt wanted to appoint a westerner. Douglas’ name was in the mix, in large part because of his political connections and because he was Brandeis’ choice. However, there were those who doubted his western credentials because, by then, he had been on the east coast since the early 1920s. A United States Senator from Washington State was a key contender, but he was undermined by political enemies. Douglas was appointed in 1939 at age 40.
Scholars have criticized his decisions as not being sufficiently scholarly. But he wrote for the public and for posterity, not for law review articles. He wrote path-breaking decisions in the privacy and due process areas. His decisions in the environmental area are limited because true environmental cases did not come to the Court in large numbers until late in his career. However, he authored a number of important dissents from the Court’s failure to hear various environmental cases.
During his 36 plus years on the Court, he dissented in 486 cases. He was not one to lobby his fellow justices to adopt his views. As he said, “I haven’t been much of a proselytizer on the Court. I’ve had the theory that the only soul I had to save was my own.”
HikingMike via Flickr
Sierra Club v. Morton (1972). The case involved a proposal by Walt Disney Corporation to build a ski resort in Mineral King Valley in California. The Court determined that the Sierra Club did not have standing to bring the case because the Club had not claimed direct injury to its members. In his dissent, Douglas argued that nature, such as trees, lakes, and wildlife, should have standing to sue for their protection in their own right.
After further court proceedings and the passage of time, Disney decided to abandon the project. The ski resort was never built.
Read Next in ...& the West
Once prized as a key ingredient in fire retardant foam, non-stick pans and many everyday items, a synthetic chemical’s appearance in public water supply wells raises questions of how to protect the public from unknown health hazards.
Submit your own thoughts and questions by using the form at the bottom of this page. Entries will be reviewed and posted as we get them.