Main content start
Center News
Research Notes
Rural West

Midlands Voices: Make sure that rural health needs are understood and addressed

By Dennis Berens and Phil Polakoff in a special editorial to The Omaha World-Herald.

We are pleased to share this guest editorial by Bill Lane Center Affiliated Scholar Phillip Polakoff that ran in the March 21 edition of the Omaha World-Herald. From September 15-17, Polakoff’s organization “A Healthier We” will be hosting a summit that aims to address the many key challenges facing rural America. More information on the summit can be found here.

Berens, a Lincoln resident, is a rural health strategist and former president of the National Rural Health Association. Polakoff, M.D., is MPH Consulting Professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

If you thought each of the nations of the world exists in a vacuum, the spread of the latest coronavirus should have convinced you otherwise. Today, with instant communication, rapid transportation and interconnected trade in goods and ideas, no nation is freestanding. Not even the United States.

The same thing is true within our nation. No group is freestanding, whether that group is identified by history, ethnicity, geography or place in the economy. What affects one group affects all groups.

That’s why, as we struggle to find a way to keep ourselves healthy and to make quality health care available to “everyone” in the U.S., we need to remember we’re talking about everyone.

One group that’s often forgotten in this cultural and political struggle is rural Americans and the many small — often very small — communities they live in.

For more than 30 years, we both have traveled the highways and gravel roads of our country, one as the director of the Nebraska State Office of Rural Health, the other as a clinician/health care consultant for an array of public-private entities. We worked with rural communities trying to care for each other in a national system that works poorly — if at all — in sparsely populated areas.

We quickly learned that rural is not simply a smaller version of urban. Everyone’s basic health care needs may be similar, but those needs are shaped by geography, demography, resources and cultural expectations.

It’s easy for policymakers and political leaders at all levels to focus on the largest groups and the most concentrated populations and to set aside the needs of those in sparsely populated places. It’s easy to focus on efficiencies of scale and to neglect the valued and cherished resources of our national life together.

Our national motto says it clearly: “E pluribus unum. Out of many, one.” If one part of our nation is forgotten in the rush to serve another, we are no longer one. And all will suffer in the long term.

As the nation argues over whether change to its health care system should be evolutionary or revolutionary, rural people need to be part of the argument, part of the discussion and intimately involved in the solution. Their specific situation, needs and perspective must be considered.

In this interconnected world, if one segment suffers, we all suffer. But if “I” is replaced with “we,” even illness can become wellness.

For one and all, we must convene, connect, communicate, collaborate and commit to succeed in securing a healthier rural America.

Recent Center News

Rollback of protections for roadless areas ignites debate over wildfire management; new concept for managing Colorado River flows proposed amid dwindling reservoirs; domestic policy package threatens Native American and Indigenous communities; agrivoltaics meet resistance from farmers and utilities in Arizona, and more environmental news from around the West.

Getty

Since its founding two decades ago, the Bill Lane Center has become a thriving community of students and researchers who examine the American West in all its complexities.
In 2021, we interviewed Buzz Thompson about a newly-launched California water market, seen primarily as a tool to help farmers hedge against water price increases. Now, Thompson has co-authored a study proposing an "environmental" water market with both economic and ecological value.