From 'on the screen' to 'on the ground': Shifting from data analysis to fieldwork at the Deschutes Land Trust
By
Varun Shirhatti
Varun Shirhatti (he/him) Hometown: Bangalore, India Major: Earth Systems, '25 Internship: Deschutes Land Trust
Varun Shirhatti reflects on the differences between data analysis and conservation fieldwork through his internship at the Deschutes Land Trust
I arrived in Bend in the last week of June, excited to begin my internship with the Deschutes Land Trust. I was going to be joining in on stewardship and fieldwork sessions, but my main task for the summer was to examine and map remote sensing data from the Land Trust’s protected lands. Through analyzing this data, I would then assess trends in carbon storage and canopy cover. For example, in looking at data from a place like the Metolius Preserve, a rich forest habitat of 1,240 acres, we could gauge the success of forest restoration efforts to help store more carbon there.
I would sit in the office for hours, cataloging years’ worth of aerial imagery into easily accessible folders before importing them into my mapping software and running calculations. It was deeply gratifying to get the mapping work done; seeing the maps of carbon storage shift year-to-year was particularly eye-catching, and matching up those shifts to tree thinning and the subsequent recovery was like solving a puzzle, slowly piecing together a picture of the Metolius Preserve’s history.
About a month later, I had my preliminary findings. As it turned out, the Land Trust’s forest restoration efforts actually had improved the forest’s capacity for regeneration and carbon storage! Even though I hadn’t been around for the actual projects, I was excited to see my data show that forest restoration work can help improve the carbon storage capabilities of the forest. This would have been hard to determine without the kind of work I was doing, so it felt like I was really making a difference.
Seven weeks in, though, I had an experience that put my work behind a laptop screen to shame. I joined Peter Cooper, from the stewardship team, on a monitoring visit at Metolius. I had tagged along on the stewardship team’s visits to different Land Trust-managed properties before, but this was the first time I would be setting foot on one of the Preserves for which I had been mapping carbon and canopy data.
Bright and early on Monday morning, as we pulled into the northern entrance to the Preserve, I attempted to coax my freshly caffeinated brain to figure out where we were on the maps I had been working with on my laptop so I could compare it to what I was seeing. That effort failed immediately when I stepped out of the car and got a good look at the conifer forest around me. In the still-soft morning sun, now-familiar ponderosa pines rose like pillars into the sky, mixed in with what I had just been taught to identify as Douglas and grand firs. Here and there, the bright green needles of larch trees shone in shafts of sunlight. Below the tallest trees grew younger, denser-leaved members of all four species, and in the open space around the parking lot I could see tiny seedlings, needles still too big for their tiny stems and branches.
As we hiked through the Preserve, Peter checked camera traps and photopoints, and my eye was drawn over and over to the details my mapping data couldn’t capture. Even this late in the summer, the trails were lined with more wildflowers than I could name. Butterflies flitted from plant to plant, while bees trundled amiably around each flower in a cluster before moving on. Tiny wild blackberries swelled from vines like rubies. Oregon grapes (which I didn’t know existed before this visit), impossibly round and tart as gooseberries, were everywhere. The pièce de résistance was when we reached a meadow, incongruous after walking under so many towering trees. On a whim, I checked a trail map, and something tickled my memory. My mind felt like it was expanding as I suddenly made the connection – I’d seen this place before! In my maps, there were patches of low carbon storage with no canopy cover, and I had just walked right through one of them.
With that meadow reference point in mind, I could (roughly) map out the path Peter and I had walked, comparing the impossible diversity of the forest to the numbers that had been dancing on my laptop screen for weeks. They weren’t mutually exclusive – everything I was seeing was encompassed by the carbon values on my maps – but the data didn’t tell me anything about the lives of grapes, birds, or bears. Here was the missing link between my coursework and the Land Trust’s stewardship efforts: while I sat in a classroom for months on end, analyzing large-scale data sets, the Land Trust took those principles and expanded upon them through their conservation efforts. My maps could tell me about the success of the Land Trust’s restoration work and improvements in carbon storage, but the only way to learn the full story of a place is to get out on the ground and see the little things – the butterflies, bees, and berries that also benefit from the long-term protection that a land trust provides.
President Biden apologizes for the lethal harms caused by Native American boarding schools; avian botulism wreaks havoc in a wildlife refuge in Northern California; a new carbon capture technique, and other environmental news from around the West.
In the second episode of a series of podcasts on the West, Grey Matter host Michael Krasny interviews Felicity Barringer about the environmental journalism magazine she launched for the Bill Lane Center.
During the Lane Center's 2024 Sophomore College course on coastal resilience, students traveled up and down the West Coast, hearing from various stakeholders about how to address the growing threats posed by climate change.