Main content start
Center News

Weighing Californians’ Appetite for Water Reductions

Image caption: Lake Oroville reservoir in the summer of 2014. Image credit: California Department of Water Resources

Buffeted by years of drought, Californians appear more ready than ever to make sacrifices to address the state's water challenges. According to a poll conducted in late August and early September, 54 percent of likely voters in California supported mandatory cutbacks in water supplies, and that "dealing with the state's water problems" topped their priorities for state government. 

Poll respondents also showed high levels of support for a variety of water storage investments, from dams and reservoirs (70 percent in favor), desalination (81 percent), aquifer storage and recharge (89 percent) and stormwater recycling (91 percent). Support for recycled drinking water varied from 10 to 43 percent, with those who knew more about how the process works showing greater comfort with the idea.

Bruce Cain, the Spence and Cleone Eccles Family Director of the Bill Lane Center for the American West, helped the Hoover Institution design the poll, which was administered by the polling firm YouGov.  It surveyed 1,500 adult Californians from around the state between August 31 and September 11.

Earlier this week, Prof. Cain joined a panel at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco to talk about the results. Concluding that voters had largely accepted California Governor Jerry Brown's water policy so far, he added a note of caution: "but the reality is that we've done so far is the easy stuff, and what we're facing is potentially a bigger and deeper problem." Cain cited two concerns: one, that California's water infrastructure was designed during what scientists now believe was an atypically wet 20th century, meaning that even normal conditions might be much drier than we realize; second, that rising temperatures due to climate change may undo the state's system of using winter snowpack as a "frozen reservoir."

"That system," he concluded, "is being undermined systematically and it's not clear that if we have to go to deeper cuts if we're going to find that level of public support."

Listen to the event

 

READ MORE ABOUT THE POLL IN THE STANFORD REPORT »

Recent Center News

Drying Colorado River tributaries send less water downstream; should people be allowed to bet on wildfires?; the Pacific Ocean is running a fever – what that could mean for coastal flooding; senate testimony of Klamath tribal member set to take over Indian Health Service; and more environmental news from around the West.
Image caption:

headshot of Dave Danbom. Dave is smiling with glasses and a hat, with a river in the background. 

The Center is deeply saddened to report that friend of the Center, David B. Danbom, passed away on June 26, 2026.David was born in Denver, Colorado, on March 29, 1947. He attended Denver Public Schools and received degrees from Colorado State University (1969), and Stanford University (1970, 1974).
Already faced with extreme distances and a low population base, rural hospitals are being put on their heels by federal funding cutbacks. Specialty care is increasingly difficult to supply and closures loom as a possibility for dozens of facilities.